Prof Andrew Gelman - Causality and Statistical Learning

12 February 2014, 11.00 PM - 12 February 2014, 11.00 PM

Causal inference is central to the social and biomedical sciences - this talk will consider various approaches to causal reasoning
Joint Seminar Between: 

MRC Epidemiology Unit (IEU), School of Social and Community Medicine, Department of Statistics and the School of Experimental Psychology

Date:   
    Wednesday, 12th February, 2014
Time:       1600 - 1700
Venue:     Lecture Theatre 2, Department of Chemistry

Professor Andrew Gelman, Director, Applied Statistics Centre, Columbia University

Abstract

Causal inference is central to the social and biomedical sciences. There are unresolved debates about the meaning of causality and the methods that should be used to measure it. As a statistician, I am trained to say that randomized experiments are a gold standard, yet I have spent almost all my applied career analyzing observational data. In this talk we shall consider various approaches to causal reasoning from the perspective of an applied statistician who recognizes the importance of causal identification, yet must learn from available information.

Professor Andrew Gelman

Andrew Gelman is a Professor of Statistics and Political Science and Director of the Applied Statistics Center at Columbia University. He has received the Outstanding Statistical Application award from the American Statistical Association, the award for best article published in the American Political Science Review, and the Council of Presidents of Statistical Societies award for outstanding contributions by a person under the age of 40. His books include Bayesian Data Analysis (with John Carlin, Hal Stern, and Don Rubin, and David Dunson and Aki Vehtari (co-authors)), Teaching Statistics: A Bag of Tricks (with Deb Nolan), Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (with Jennifer Hill), Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do (with David Park, Boris Shor, Joe Bafumi, and Jeronimo Cortina), and A Quantitative Tour of the Social Sciences (co-edited with Jeronimo Cortina).

Andrew has done research on a wide range of topics, including: why it is rational to vote; why campaign polls are so variable when elections are so predictable; why redistricting is good for democracy; reversals of death sentences; police stops in New York City, the statistical challenges of estimating small effects; the probability that your vote will be decisive; seats and votes in Congress; social network structure; arsenic in Bangladesh; radon in your basement; toxicology; medical imaging; and methods in surveys, experimental design, statistical inference, computation, and graphics.

Contact information

Please contact MRC IEU for further information.

Edit this page