Skip to main content

Unit information: Understanding Intimacy in 2014/15

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Understanding Intimacy
Unit code SOCIM2130
Credit points 20
Level of study M/7
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24)
Unit director Professor. Dermott
Open unit status Not open
Pre-requisites

s None

Co-requisites

s None

School/department School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies
Faculty Faculty of Social Sciences and Law

Description including Unit Aims

This unit will explore the concept of intimacy within the context of the alleged democratisation of interpersonal and family relationships within Western industrialised societies. It will examine: the complexities of contemporary family life in historical and cultural context; the spatial and temporal construction of intimacy; competing theoretical perspectives; the importance of negotiated personal relationships for individuals') identities. The unit will cover current debates around parenting and family life, the rituals of intimacy, rights and responsibilities in personal relationships and the work/labour of intimacy in order to address questions such as- How do popular images of intimacy relate to lived experience? What explains changing rates of marriage and cohabitation? How does the state influence the organisation of intimate relationships? Does 'caring about' correspond to 'caring for'? What are the similarities and differences between fathering and mothering?

Aims:

  • To explore theories of intimacy
  • To introduce students to the main issues and problems involved in studying personal life
  • To discuss sociological studies of intimacy
  • To consider a range of contemporary debates on personal relationships
  • To examine the cultural and historical context for discussions of intimacy

Intended Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit students will be able to:

  • Recognise and evaluate competing theories of intimacy
  • Demonstrate awareness of the range of methods used in research ing personal life and their associated limitations
  • Use appropriate evidence from empirical research to illustrate views of intimate relations and family life
  • Show understanding of how intimacy is incorporated into popular debates
  • Situate discussions of intimacy in cultural and historical context

Teaching Information

The main method of teaching will be weekly face-to-face seminar sessions which will involve a combination of lecturing, group discussion and student presentations. This will be supplemented by Elearning through a VLE (Blackboard) to promote student debate.

Assessment Information

The assessment will relate directly to one of more of the learning outcomes specified above in 15 and will be an extended essay of 4000 words (or equivalent) showing an in-depth understanding and integration of key aspects of the unit.

Reading and References

  • Beck U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Carling, A., Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (eds) (2002) Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice London: Routledge.
  • Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities London: Routledge.
  • Gillis, J. (1997) A World of Their Own Making Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Jamieson, L. (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Journal of Marriage and Family

Feedback