The Transport Plan (as agreed by Council and Board)


Introduction

Part one of this document sets out the University of Bristol Transport Plan as agreed by University Council in July 1999, while Part Two contains background information describing how the Plan was formulated. The Plan looks at the period 1999-2003 and details the measures that the University will take over this period to ease the transport difficulties that staff encounter when travelling to work.

(Back to top)

Part one - The Transport Plan

Objectives

The objective of the Transport Plan is to ease the car parking problems at the University and reduce the University’s environmental impact by introducing initiatives to assist staff in using alternatives to the private car. The Plan aims to ensure that all staff working in the main precinct have greater choice and flexibility in how they travel to work each day. It is important to emphasize that the University Transport Plan is a single proposal, made up of the many different initiatives detailed in this report. It is hoped that Bristol City Council and other external agents will recognise the significant steps that the University of Bristol is taking in this area.

(Back to top)

Targets and Monitoring

No specific targets have been produced for the behavioural changes or modal shift it is hoped the Transport Plan will ultimately produce. For the Plan to be successful there will obviously need to be some reduction in the number of journeys taken by private car, but it was deemed unhelpful to try and quantify this figure. Base line data for modal share was produced from the 1998 staff travel survey and in October 2000 it will be necessary to undertake another survey to see what effect the Plan’s measures have had on travel patterns.

(Back to top)

Area of jurisdiction

The University Transport Plan will cover all car parks and staff working in the main precinct and central hospitals, including Berkeley Square, Canynge Hall and the Students Union. The Clifton Halls of Residence, Leigh Woods, the Stoke Bishop Halls of Residence and the Langford site will all be exempt from the measures contained within the Transport Plan as their individual circumstances currently warrant separate consideration and management. Staff working in these sites will only be able to take advantage of a limited number of initiatives outlined in the Transport Plan.

(Back to top)

Management

The Travel to Work Committee, which will represent a cross-section of the University community, will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Transport Plan. Day to day management of the Plan will be undertaken by members of the Bursar’s Department under guidance from the Committee. The Policy, Priorities and Resources Board will be responsible for determining matters of policy, such as the level of parking charges.

(Back to top)

Implementation

The introduction of the new policy will be subject to a programme of phased implementation, with the majority of new incentives being introduced early in the 1999 Autumn academic session. Changes to the levels of parking charges and the basis for permit allocation and other car park management measures would be implemented in August 2000. This will allow staff twelve months to explore alternative methods of travelling to work, before major changes in car parking arrangements are introduced.

(Back to top)

Working with external bodies

In order to further the aims of the Transport Plan, the University will continue to work closely with UBHT and other large employers in the city to ensure cooperation on joint transport initiatives where appropriate, but also to lobby for better transport infrastructure within Bristol. Discussions will continue with public transport providers to look for ways of securing a better deal for University staff. Bristol City Council has agreed to set up a Green Commuter Club in September 1999 to bring together Bristol’s largest employers to discuss travel to work issues of common interest. The University was involved in lobbying for the creation of this group and will play an active part in progressing its aims.

(Back to top)

Specific measures contained within the Transport Plan

University car parking procedures

Interim changes in car parking procedures (from August 1999 - July 2000)

The new University parking scheme (from 1st August 2000 onwards)

(Back to top)

Incentives to encourage alternatives to the private car

Incentives to encourage walking, cycling and motorcycling (to be introduced during 1999/00)

Initiatives to encourage the use of public transport (to be introduced during 1999/00)

(Back to top)

Matters of policy which the Travel to Work Committee will need to determine

(Back to top)

Part Two - Background

How and why the University Transport Plan was formulated

Part One detailed the policy and implementation of the University's Transport Plan, while Part Two provides the background to how the Plan evolved. It describes the steps taken by the University to identify staff travel to work difficulties, which resulted in the formulation of the University of Bristol's Transport Plan.

(Back to top)

Working Group

In May 1998 a Working Group, under the chairmanship of Sir Robert Wall, was asked to review and make recommendations on all issues relating to the ways in which members of the University staff travel to work in the precinct. The main aim of the Report was to identify the necessary steps to resolve the car parking crisis and other transport difficulties faced by University staff when travelling to work.

(Back to top)

Context

The context within which the University Transport Plan was formulated is detailed below:

University context

National and Local Government context

(Back to top)

Staff Travel Survey

A travel survey was produced and sent out to all members of University staff in October 1998. It determined the modal split of staff journeys to work and gauged opinion on some of the measures that the University could introduce to ease the parking situation. Feedback from the survey was positive, with over a 50% response rate. Data from the survey was crucial in formulating the recommendations in the Working Group’s Report. (Results of the survey are available on application to the University of Bristol, see page 6)

(Back to top)

The Working Group Report

The Working Group submitted its final Report to the Vice-Chancellor in early March 1999. The Report recommended that the way University car parking permits are allocated should be altered from a system of predominantly guaranteed spaces to a pay and display, “license to hunt” arrangement. Hence more of the parking spaces would be available to more staff, which would be “fairer” than a system of limited guaranteed spaces. In tandem the level of car parking charges would be significantly increased to realize sufficient revenue to fund initiatives encouraging alternatives to the private car. It was felt that the increased level of charges would also actively encourage staff to consider alternative modes of transport and car-sharing, while the imposition of a daily rather than an annual charge would remove the incentive for staff to drive to work every day.

(Back to top)

Consultation

Professor Partington, a Pro-Vice-Chancellor, was asked to lead a consultative exercise to gauge staff opinion on the Report’s recommendations. During April and May 1999 a wide spread consultation exercise was undertaken including the following measures:

The following responses were received:

(Back to top)

Revision of the original proposals

The Report provoked significant staff interest, comment and concern and the consultation identified areas of general consensus but also a number of recommendations that staff found unacceptable. There seemed substantial - if not universal - agreement that the existing situation was not sustainable and that something should be done. Although many staff supported the thrust of the recommendations, there was strong objection to a number of individual proposals, in particular: the proposed level of parking charges; the proposal for a flat rate rather than a pro rata parking charge; the apparent failure to take need into account in the proposed permit allocation and the short time-frame before the proposed implementation of the new scheme.

The original proposals were substantially revised to address many of these concerns, but without compromising their underlining philosophy; namely to encourage alternatives to the private car. In particular:

After considerable discussion at the Policy, Priorities and Resources Board in June and July 1999, and Council in May and July 1999, a series of revised recommendations were adopted which are collectively referred to as the University Transport Plan.

(Back to top)