Redeployment process guidance


Redeployment policy

The University is committed to the delivery of research and education of the highest quality. Continuity of employment is an important element in achieving this. It is also the case that change is a regular and important part of the University maintaining a competitive and sustainable position and, over time, some activities will need to cease and new activities develop. The redeployment of staff from one activity to another has a key part to play in helping to ensure a balance between the need for continuity and the need for change.

Effective reallocation of work and/or redeployment retains valuable skills and knowledge within the University, contributes to the creation of a positive work environment and meets the University's moral and legal obligations. It should also provide the University with the means to achieve a broader skills base and more flexible workforce in the longer term, whilst accepting the need to create/recruit new skills and talent where appropriate.

The University's aim is to minimise the number of involuntary redundancies. Accordingly, where an individual has been given notice of redundancy the University will, where requested, work with that individual to identify possible redeployment opportunities. It also aims to minimise the number of redundancy cases coming forward, by seeking, wherever possible, to identify opportunities to redeploy individuals prior to any formal redundancy situation being instigated, whilst operating at all times within a framework that assures quality, and addresses equality of opportunity and diversity issues.

The University is working towards a fully joined-up approach to resourcing, encompassing all temporary and permanent resourcing needs, which will be underpinned by a new e-recruitment system. This will see a wider range of opportunities for matching redeployees to resourcing needs.

(Back to top)

Identifying staff as at risk of redundancy

Members of staff will be deemed to be at risk of redundancy in the following circumstances:

Staff needing to be redeployed for non-redundancy reasons (including health issues) are also covered by this process.

(Back to top)

Responsibilities

The individual at risk of redundancy will be required to make pro-active efforts to secure suitable alternative employment, including:

Managers will have a role in supporting redeployees and ensuring consideration of suitability where a potential match is identified, as well as strategic decisions on moving staff around the organisation.

Redeployees and managers will also be supported by advice and guidance from HR Managers throughout the process.

(Back to top)

Local redeployment and workforce planning

Where a member of staff is potentially at risk of redundancy, local management will initially ensure that potential local redeployment opportunities within the School or Division are explored, including the following:

Naming on grants - Authors of research grants should take any staff at risk of redundancy into consideration when deciding who to name on any grant before the application is submitted.

Temporary cover - Where short-term roles or tasks need to be covered any staff at risk of redundancy should be considered prior to or instead of engaging temporary staff.

Other staffing changes in the School/Division - Any staff at risk of redundancy should be taken into consideration when other staffing changes occur, for instance adjustments to work patterns, re-training and re-assignment, voluntary redundancy for other members of staff.

(Back to top)

Redeployment for research & teaching and clinical staff 

How the redeployment process for research and teaching and clinical staff operates is outlined here.

(Back to top)

University Redeployment Pool (URP) for support staff

How the central URP for support staff operates is outlined here.

(Back to top)

Selection process at redeployment stage

The selection process should follow the same basic principles of recruitment and selection best practice as outlined in the University's Guide to Successful Recruitment and Selection. This should include the following steps:

  • Full and detailed further particulars for the position are developed, including clear selection criteria outlining the skills, knowledge and experience required (the University's further particulars template should be used for this).
  • Ensure that any at risk individual is able to informally discuss the position with relevant parties (e.g. their line manager, the recruiting manager, HR Manager) before deciding whether they wish to be considered.
  • Where there is a potential match between an at risk candidate and the essential criteria for the role a selection process will be undertaken, including an interview, using the University's standard recruitment procedure and forms.
  • In determining suitability the recruiting manager should assess the individual against the selection criteria and the requirements of the job. This should also include considering the possibility of providing a short period of relevant training to bring the individual up to the required skill level or to develop new skills if this is required and appropriate in the circumstances. A record of the reasons for the decision made should be kept and feedback given to individuals who are not selected.
  • Any reasonable adjustments for candidates with a disability/ medical condition, as defined in the Equality Act, will be fully taken into account, in consultation with the HR Manager.
  • Where there are significant differences from the candidate's current role and/or they may be suitable for the new position provided they receive reasonable retraining, a trial period may be appropriate.
  • The recruiting manager will notify any unsuccessful at risk applicant of the decision and reasons in writing. If the applicant has been interviewed then the opportunity for feedback should also be offered.

HR Managers will be able to advice on individual cases where required.

(Back to top)

At risk staff applying for advertised vacancies

Where an at risk member of staff identifies a vacancy of interest on the University's jobs web site, they should assess whether they believe they meet the minimum selection criteria. If so, an application should be submitted demonstrating how the selection criteria are met. If the application is submitted with a redeployment covering memo the individual will be given an interview if they have demonstrated that they meet the essential selection criteria.

Where the recruiting manager decides that an at risk applicant should either not be short-listed because they do not meet the essential selection criteria or is interviewed and then not selected for appointment, the reasons for the decision will be recorded (through full and proper use of the standard short-listing and interview forms). The recruiting manager will also notify the at risk applicant of the decision and reasons in writing, outlining those areas where the individual's application does not provide evidence of meeting the selection criteria. If the applicant has been interviewed then the opportunity for feedback will also be offered.

(Back to top)

Defining suitability

Suitable alternative employment

In deciding what constitutes suitable alternative employment it is necessary to take various factors into account including not only matters such as job content, hours of work, workplace, pay level and career development prospects but also the requirements of the job in terms of skills, knowledge and experience.

Determining suitability for the role

It is for the recruiting manager and selection panel to define and judge suitability. The legal right regarding alternative employment applies in circumstances where the vacancy is suitable for that individual and vice-versa, given reasonable retraining where that is appropriate. What is essential is that:

  • The recruiting manager considers carefully each application from an at risk member of staff, matching the individual's skills, abilities and experience against the specific selection criteria and job requirements;
  • Transferability of the on notice applicant's skills and experience and the feasibility of a training period are fully considered;
  • The recruiting manager records full details of the decision made and reasons for it;
  • The grounds for reaching the decision are reasonable and defensible and relate to the selection criteria and job requirements.

Trial periods

Where there are anything other than minor differences from the at risk applicants current role and/or they may be suitable for the vacancy provided they receive reasonable retraining, the recruiting manager, following consultation with their HR Manager, may offer the post on a trial basis of between four and twelve weeks (depending on the nature and duration of the training required). The individual may also request a trial period of not less than four week in these circumstances. The details of the trial period will be clearly confirmed in the formal offer letter from HR.

The recruiting manager will set out for the individual a clear and reasonable statement of performance standards and objectives to be met and support to be provided during the trial period. Progress will be reviewed during the period through regular and recorded meetings between the individual (and trade union representative, where requested), the line manager (and the HR Manager where appropriate). The trial period is a two-way process and the views of the individual will be considered throughout.

If there is sufficient evidence that the performance standards and objectives have not been met satisfactorily by the end of or during the trial period and further suitable alternatives have not been identified (including a return to their previous role where this still exists and is vacant), the University may terminate the individual's employment.

If the University terminates employment on this basis, the individual is considered to be dismissed due to redundancy at the point at which their employment ends and they will receive a statutory redundancy payment calculated to that date.

However, if the University terminates employment for any other reason, for instance gross misconduct during the trial period, the individual is not dismissed due to redundancy and will receive no redundancy payment.

If the individual decides not to accept the new position during, or at the end of the trial period, and further suitable alternatives have not been identified, their current employment terminates at this point. Whether they receive a redundancy payment will depend upon whether they are judged to have unreasonably refused a suitable alternative position and their length of service.

Salary

Where an individual is already paid at the grade for the vacancy they have applied for, the normal expectation will be that their current salary level will be matched. Where the grade for the vacancy is lower than their current grade, they will be paid at an appropriate point on the new grade; where it is higher they will paid at an appropriate point on the higher grade.

Non-acceptance of offers of suitable alternative employment

Where an individual has been selected for and offered a redeployment opportunity they would normally be expected to accept this alternative employment. In most cases, by this stage the individual would have already identified the position as being suitable alternative employment, supported by their line manager and HR Manager.

However, there may still be some personal circumstances which mean that it is reasonable for an individual to refuse it. For instance, changes in location or hours of work that may impact on the individuals care responsibilities. Every reasonable effort will therefore be made to address these issues, for instance through flexible working arrangements or a trial period.

(Back to top)

Redeployment of staff for reasons other than redundancy

Further information on redeployment of staff for reasons other than redundancy is outlined here.

(Back to top)

Contacts

If you have any enquiries regarding redeployment please contact your HR Manager or Eddie Procter, Resourcing Manager.