Browse/search for people

Publication - Dr Jonathan Grose

    Social Norms and Game Theory: Harmony or Discord?

    Citation

    Paternotte, C & Grose, J, 2013, ‘Social Norms and Game Theory: Harmony or Discord?’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol 64., pp. 551-587

    Abstract

    Recent years have witnessed an increased number of game-theoretic approaches to social norms, which apparently share some common vocabulary and methods. We describe three major approaches of this kind (due to Binmore, Bicchieri, and Gintis), before comparing them systematically on five crucial themes: generality of the solution, preference transformation, punishment, epistemic conditions, and type of explanation. This allows us to show that these theories are, by and large, less compatible than they seem. We then argue that those three theories struggle to account for three phenomena pertaining to social norms (namely context dependence, conflicting norms, and self-evidence), with which any complete game-theoretic account should in principle be able to deal.

    Full details in the University publications repository