Home
News
Research
Publications
Events
People
Press
MSc
Economics Dept
Search
Contact Us
Internal
Page



|
Marshall M, (2002)
‘The Publication of Performance Data in the National Health Service’
NHS research paper, no longer available
online.
- Outlines the risks and benefits of publishing performance data (‘report
cards’) for the NHS, and reviews the evidence from the US and UK on
the impact of report cards.
Policy Context:
- The NHS does not have a strong history of public disclosure
of data.
- Public demands for greater accountability of public services,
as well as improvements in the ability to measure aspects of clinical
practice,
mean that this is now changing
- Public and media concern at recent high-profile
examples of the failure of self-policing have also been important in
driving demands for evidence
of performance standards.
Evidence on public release of performance data:
- The US has most experience
of public disclosure in modern times.
- The evidence suggests that
although consumers want more information about provider performance,
published data has only a small impact
on consumer decision
making.
- Lack of interest in and use of performance data appears
to be due to difficulty in understanding the information, lack of
trust in
the data, problems with timely access to the information, and
lack
of choice.
- There is some evidence that provider organisations
are more responsive to performance data than consumers, purchasers
or individual doctors.
- Organisations shown in a positive light by performance
reports are more likely to use the information for benchmarking
and
internal performance
monitoring.
Those identified as poor performers are more likely to
criticise the validity of the data.
- Marshall also notes that the design
of report cards is crucial, with cognitive science research in the
US showing that, irrespective
of
content, most US report cards are poorly designed and
their impact could be considerably
improved by applying current cognitive research knowledge.
Top of Page
|