Some suggestions

Back Up

horizontal rule

Home
Reading Results so far
Teaching Reading in Sign Bilingual Approach
Some suggestions

Some suggestions

Possibilities for the development of a reading programme for Deaf children bearing in mind the variability in first language performance in BSL include the following points.

  1. Reading development needs some preparatory activities – just as does the hearing children’s development of readiness to read.  This is most likely to be awareness about print, about story sequences (ie the fact that stories have beginnings, middles and ends), about relations of words and pictures.  These are all pre-reading activities which Deaf children can engage in.  Most commonly they are embedded in story telling activities in BSL but even where there is limited access to BSL, the child can still work with books, pictures and symbolic representations.
  2. Materials in the pre-reading stage need to be interactive – that it the parents or pre-school are able to comment on, interpret the pictures, words or the format.  In this way the child begins to attach meaningful activities to the presentation of text materials.  Again this does not especially need BSL although it is enhanced by its use.
  3. Word picture matching is a realistic achievable task for Deaf children and the development of sight vocabulary would seem like a realistic target in the earliest literacy classes.
  4. The next step is probably writing, rather than reading.  At this time, having introduced books and communicative experiences, which can express the child’s meaning, the child can be encourage to name objects by writing words next to pictures.  In effect, the child begins to communicate with the pictures.
  5. The extension of this is into experience based approaches, where the events on a class outing or activity are re-created as a picture with labels.  The child begins to express or annotate the experiences with words.
  6. At this time, the use of sign language begins to make this process much simpler – since the beginnings of the necessary contrastive analysis can be carried out – word-picture-sign matching would begin to ensure the development of an encoding system.
  7. From there, the next stage is to introduce the language experience approach but with the lead of writing rather than reading.  Events lead to discussions in BSL, which in turn are recorded as video stories, pictures, with word annotation and gradually an increasingly with written text constructed by teacher and pupil together.
  8. Beyond this the child begins to construct the written text from the experiences directly without pictures or support from the teacher.  Where words are unknown, the child may be able to use a magic line technique where unknown words can be left out, to be filled in by teacher or parent.
  9. At this point dialogue journal which are means of communication begin to play a role where the teacher and discuss with the child content which the child has written and can gradually shape – although not correct – the structures of English which are produced.
  10. Only at this stage would it be reasonable to begin to introduce a reading scheme.

All of the activities can continue to exist with increasing complexities and the discussion and contrastive analysis can be extended.

The principles outlined by Swanwick are accurate – contrastive analysis and meta-linguistic representations are crucial to the development.  We  are only in the beginning stages of this study.

horizontal rule

Back to MLEDC homepage
This page was last modified January 29, 2007
jim.kyle@bris.ac.uk