Note: This site is currently under construction
main events community
PARIP logo

 

PARIP Symposium
10 - 11 November 2001 | University of Bristol

    
©University of Bristol: Peter Metelerkamp

WORKSHOP GROUP 2 TRANSCRIPT

Questioning practice as research in ‘live’ media (drama, theatre, dance) and ‘recording’ media (film, TV, video). What are the differences / similarities between the production of practice as research and practice-based research in respect of ‘live’ and ‘mediatized’ performance?

Rapporteur: Christine White, University of Loughborough

We began by recognizing that the situation of defining terms has been brought about by the politics of funding, and there’s a problem with these media being used to document. There’s also the problem of judgement in terms of the aesthetic of a film object being very different to the aesthetic of media being used to make a document. We also wanted to distinguish between film, television and video as an art form and the use of all of those to document live performance. The process of making film, television and video is a self-documenting process where the outcome can be expressed in the outtakes, which is different to the use of these media to document. The aesthetic for documentation in live performance is very different. A unit should perhaps be set up to look at this, how the live should be recorded, but this also causes some worries. We also wanted to put forward the idea that panels — RAE, AHRB, PARIP — need to be occupied by people who understand the areas of making this work and the aesthetics that go in to making of this work, and the challenges of reading live performance when mediated through film, television and video. We also wanted to say that there’s no such thing as an unmediated document and that there’s a difference between practice as research and practice-based research and the differences are about artefact and potential pathways by which the research is developed. There’s a sketch of work that might come from film, television or video that will lead to a practice-based continuum, which might then lead to practice as research.

Comments

Janet Thumim: We also spent time looking at the question that while the outcomes of theatre, film and television practice as research will be different, the processes leading up to these outcomes are similar. This is important.

    
©University of Bristol: Peter Metelerkamp

Workshop Home

Transcribed by Angela Piccini, 1 February 2002

 

    
main events community