|
The Smugglers' City |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Fust Manuscript: The Chronicle of Maurice Toby, 1565The Fust MS. is the usual name given to a chronicle of Bristol written in 1565 by one 'Maurice Toby, gent.' The chronicle is best known for the information it contained about John Cabot's 1497 voyage to North America. The entry for Bristol's civic year 1496 (15 September 1496 -14 September 1497) stated that:
The importance of this entry is that it is the only surviving document to give the date of the departure of the expedition, the date of the landfall and the date of the expedition's return. It is also the only pre-seventeenth century document to give the name of the expedition ship. The chronicle itself was originally in the private library of the Fust family, who occupied the manor of Hill Court (ten miles north of Bristol) from 1609 to 1841. Following the death of the last member of the Fust family in 1841, the library was broken up and sold. Maurice Toby's chronicle was bought by William Strong, a Bristol bookseller. To highlight the value of the manuscript as a historical source, Strong had his assistant compare the chronicle to the works of William Barrett and Samuel Seyer: William Barrett, The History and Antiquities of the City of Bristol (Bristol, 1789); Samuel Seyer, Memoirs Historical and Topographical of Bristol and its Neighbourhood, from the Earliest Period Down to the Present Time (Bristol, 1821-23). Having reviewed these publications, William Strong's assistant transcribed those entries in Maurice Toby's chronicle that contained information not found in them. The original manuscript, accompanied by the volume of transcribed excerpts, was then sold to Sir Hugh Smyth-Piggot of Ashton Court (c. 2 miles west of Bristol). William Strong, however, also retained an additional copy of the excerpts for his own use. In October 1849 the chronicle was sold at auction, along with the bulk of Smyth-Pigott's library, by Messrs. English & Son of Bath. In the sales catalogue, the chronicle is described thus:
In the event, Maurice Toby's chronicle was bought in and thus remained in Smyth-Pigott's library until his death in 1853. The chronicle was then again auctioned, this time by Sotheby and Wilkinson of London. The sales catalogue description is as follows:
Sotheby & Wilkinson's copy of their sales catalogue, now in the British Library, indicates that the chronicle was sold to 'Kerslake', for the sum of £11 5s. This was Thomas Kerslake, another Bristol bookseller and antiquarian. Maurice Toby's chronicle was destroyed in a fire that gutted Thomas Kerslake's shop on 14 February 1860. An account of the fire can be found in: 'Destructive fire in Park-Street' The Bristol Times and Felix Farley's Journal, 18 February 1860, p.7. Although the manuscript itself perished, the two volumes of excerpts were rescued. One of these was the original volume produced by Strong, which was sold, along with the chronicle, first to Smyth-Piggott and then by Sotheby & Wilkinson to Kerslake. The other copy of the excerpts had, according to George Weare, been retained by William Strong but was later sold to Kerslake after the Sotheby & Wilkinson auction in 1853. The entry in the Fust MS. that relates to Cabot's 1497 voyage, quoted at the beginning of this page, was taken from one of the volumes of excerpts. This entry from the chronicle was first published in 1876 by Encyclopaedia Britannica. The full and more accurate transcription, reproduced here, was published in 1897 by George Weare. At the same time Weare provided a detailed account of the history of the chronicle from its purchase in the 1840s until its destruction in 1860: G.E. Weare, Cabot's Discovery of North America, (London, 1897), p.115-22. His account was carefully documented and, in so far as it has been checked, appears accurate. The controversy that surrounds the Fust MS. began shortly after the publication of Weare's book. The controversy started when Henry Harrisse, an American historian, suggested that the original manuscript was a fake, produced by the eighteenth century forger and poet, Thomas Chatterton. Harrisse's desire to condemn the manuscript may have been influenced by the ways in which the 1497 entry contradicted certain suppositions Harrisse had made about the voyage in his own recently published book:John Cabot, the Discoverer of North-America and Sebastian, his Son :A Chapter of the Maritime History of England under the Tudors, 1496-1557 (London, 1896). Whatever Harrisse's motives, the vitriol of his attack on both Weare and the manuscript led to a bitter debate between the two. Their acrimonious dispute about the manuscript's authenticity can be read in the pages of Notes and Queries. The last of these, the title of which contains references to the earlier exchanges, can be found in: G.E. Weare, 'John Cabot and the Matthew. (8th S. xi, 501; xii, 49, 129)', Notes and Queries, 8th series, XII, (1897). As mentioned earlier, although the Fust MS. was destroyed, the two volumes of transcribed excerpts survived the fire at Thomas Kerslake's shop in 1860. About ten years after the fire these volumes were purchased by William George, yet another Bristol antiquarian and bookseller. William George's decedents, who remained in the booktrade until the 1990s, sold the volumes in 1953. Their catalogue description runs as follows:
The whereabouts of the above volumes of excerpts is now unknown, although enquires conducted in the 1960s concluded that they may have been bought by an American library or collector: David B. Quinn, 'John Cabot's Matthew', Times Literary Supplement, 8 June 1967, 517. From the above, it should be clear that much that relates to the Fust MS. has been lost or destroyed. Over the years, further ambiguity has been introduced to the debate by uncertainty among writers about the accuracy of different transcriptions from the manuscript, or even about the descriptions of the manuscript itself. Some commentators, indeed, seem even to have believed that doubt exists about whether the manuscript ever existed. This page was written to try and introduce at least some measure of clarity to the debate. Digital copies of the two sales catalogues entries that refer to the sale of the original chronicle in 1849 and 1853 can be accessed through the links above. The catalogue listing the sale of the excerpts in 1953 is also given. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Home | Reading | Sources | Department |